Maternal regulatory T cells play a vital role in maintaining
maternal-fetal tolerance and sustaining pregnancies. By better understanding the mechanisms by
which maternal regulatory T cells mediate immune reactions during pregnancy and
how pathogens manipulate such immune reactions, it is possible to develop
preventative measures against opportunistic pathogens that target mothers
during this critical period of time.
In many ways, the immune system’s response to
pregnancy is akin to that of organ transplantation; the maternal immune system
must determine if the growing fetus poses a threat to the mother’s own survival
and if it must be rejected (Gobert and Lafaille 2012) . This problem
results from the fetus being semiallogenic in nature, meaning that it expresses
a combination of both maternal and paternal antigens (Gobert and Lafaille 2012) . However, despite
the fact that the paternal antigens are considered foreign by the maternal
immune system, most maternal immune systems do not cause significant damage to
the developing fetus. This is made
possible by the establishment of maternal-fetal tolerance, which increases the
probability that the mother’s body will instead perceive the baby as “temporary
self” (Trowsdale and Betz 2006) . However, establishing a maternal-fetal
tolerance puts the mother at risk by limiting the capacity of her immune system
to identify other foreign pathogens that could cause her harm. Therefore, many non-overlapping mechanisms
have evolved to maintain a delicate balance between immunosuppression – to
protect the fetus from the maternal immune systems – and immune reactivity – to
protect both mother and child from invading pathogens (Munoz-Suano, Hamilton and Betz 2011) . Recent research into maternal-fetal tolerance
seeks to shed some light on these mechanisms, particularly those mediated by a
subpopulation of T cells called regulatory T cells (Tregs) (Gobert and Lafaille 2012, Munoz-Suano, Hamilton and Betz 2011, Rowe, et al. 2013) .
A recent article published in Reproduction Review, entitled “RegulatoryT Cells and the Immune Pathogenesis of Prenatal Infection”, outlined some of the novel roles that maternal regulatory T cells (Tregs) play in sustaining fetal tolerance. Normally, Tregs are responsible for inhibiting the proliferation of self-reactive T cells via secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines
Tregs are unique from the average CD4+
T cell in that they are characterized by the expression of forkhead box P3 protein
(Foxp3). Foxp3 is a transcription factor essential for the production and
normal function of Tregs (Hori, Nomura and Sakaguchi 2003) . Recent
studies have found that defects in Foxp3 can result in fatal systemic and organ-specific autoimmunity, further outlining this
protein’s importance in maintaining immune tolerance (Rowe, et al. 2013) .
To tie this into maternal immunity, Foxp3 expression is found to be
induced by trophoblast cells (specialized placental cells) and high-level
progesterone (a female hormone that supports gestation and rapidly increases in
production throughout pregnancy) (Rowe, et al. 2013) . Therefore, we would
see expect to, and most often do, see a similarly rapid increase in the
prevalence of maternal Tregs after
conception. Additionally, maternal Treg suppression has been experimentally linked to several clinical
pregnancy complications, including preeclampsia and spontaneous abortion (Rowe, et al. 2013) . Taking this into account, we would expect that
these cells must play an important role in maintaining maternal-fetal
tolerance.
However, a balance must be struck
between immunosuppression by Tregs and immune reactivity by other immune cells to promote
a healthy pregnancy. The previously
mentioned article in Reproduction Review suggests
that although maternal Tregs impair
maternal defense against pathogens that exploit the overwhelmed maternal immune
system (like listeriosis
causing bacteria Listeria monocytogenes), the evolutionary benefits of creating the
maternal-fetal tolerance often outweighs such limitations (Rowe, et al. 2013) . Other researchers suggest that the immune system
of the mother should not be thought of as suppressed, but rather modulated and streamlined
to focus on pathogen recognition, communication, trafficking and repair (Mor and Cardenas 2010) . This suggests that the mother’s immune system
is still able to mount an attack, but only when absolutely necessary. Such modulated mechanisms allow the mother to
maintain a well-balanced immune system.
Overall, what such studies suggest is that we must better understand
pathogens that are capable of manipulating the maternal immune system. By gaining a more concrete understanding of
how such pathogens establish infection and how different pathogens causing
prenatal infections compare to one another, we can better develop therapeutic strategies
that mediate how the immune system targets such pathogens. By doing so, we will help sustain pregnancies
and dramatically improve overall health of both mother and child.
Helpful Links:
For an overview on immune system changes that occur during
pregnancy, see: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3025805/
For general information about regulatory T Cells, see: http://www.ebioscience.com/knowledge-center/cell-type/t-regulatory-cells.htm
For more information on Foxp3, see: http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/gene/FOXP3
For general information about cytokines and their functions,
see: http://pathmicro.med.sc.edu/mobile/m.immuno-13.htm
Primary Sources:
Secondary Sources:
No comments:
Post a Comment