-->
Showing posts with label neutrophils. Show all posts
Showing posts with label neutrophils. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Innate Immune System may be more involved in Multiple Sclerosis than Previously Thought



        Among the many types of autoimmune disorders perhaps the most interesting and least understood disorders are those in which the immune system attacks the central nervous system.  Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disorder in which invading lymphocytes attack the protective insulation of neurons called myelin.  The disease is neurodegenerative and leaves patients wheelchair bound within a few short decades of its clinical presentation.  While scientists have unraveled many of the pathological hallmarks of the disease, its cause and effective treatment remain elusive. 

Lesions in an MS brain
            A new study in the Journal of Immunology published this month investigates the types of white blood cells that are involved in the attack of white matter (myelin) in the brain.  Previous studies have identified a subset of Helper T cells as a major cause of the pro-inflammatory environment which leads to the ultimate degeneration which is characteristic of the disease.  These cells are part of the adaptive immune systems which targets very specific pathogens and in some cases (like in MS) accidentally targets cells or proteins that are part of the body’s normal function.  However, the new article presents data that demonstrates that innate immune cells called neutrophils may be playing a role in the initial stages of the disease.  These innate immune cells are non-specific to any particular protein but instead identify and attack cells with general molecular patterns associated with invading pathogens.  This is the first time it has been shown that neutrophils have been involved in MS.  

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Sleep, Our Immune System, and Napping



Attention college students. Which of the following scenarios sounds familiar to you?

1) You have just pulled 3 all-nighters and did terribly on your exam because you could not stay awake.

2) You have just pulled 3 all-nighters, you made the mistake of taking a “nap”…and now all you can do for the next few days is sleep. So yeah, you got that extension on the paper, but are still unable to turn it in on time.


Yep, we’ve all been there. But rejoice, we finally have an alibi. It’s really not us—it’s our immune systems! …Or is it? Faraut, et al., in this paper, have hown a link between sleep deprivation and our immune system. Essentially, they have confirmed that when we are sleep deprived, certain aspects of our immune systems flare up. That flaring up can only diminished with napping or with an extended period of “recovery sleep”. In fact, the authors show that napping is even more effective at regulating immune responses than extended sleep.

For this study, Faraut, et al. plucked out 40 young, healthy men and subjected them to a series of screening tests (after paying them, of course). First, all 40 participants had to fulfil the following criteria:

They had to be:

1) Non-smokers

2) Not regular nappers (but slept regular nights for 7-9 h)

3) Between 19-25 in their BMI

4) 18-27 years old

5) Free of diseases and sleep-complaints

They were also put through various tests: psychiatric, as well as medical, screenings, sleep questionnaires, polysomnography to monitor their sleep patterns, and CRP and leukocyte concentrations to determine each individual’s healthy, non-inflammatory levels. The actual experiment itself was carried out as follows (Fig. 1):


[ Fig. 1 ]


After the third “Recovery” day, Faraut, et al. looked at 4 things: the peripheral blood leukocyte count, the level of peripheral blood inflammatory and athergenesis biomarkers, the individual sleepiness of the participants and their cortisol levels. The authors saw that in all experimental groups, the leukocyte (white blood cell) and neutrophil (inflammatory white blood cells) levels increased significantly after the “restricted” night in which they had only 2 hours of sleep. However, the group that had a half-hour nap along with their recovery sleep (Group 2) and the group that had extended sleep (Group 3) were able to decrease this spike in leukocyte/neutrophil expression. This downregulation of leukocyte levels was not evident in the group that had the recovery sleep alone (Group 1).


The researchers performed a sleepiness assessment test based on the Stanford Sleepiness Score, and the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test. The results of this test mirrored the leukocyte/neutrophil results. They saw that across all three groups, there was a uniform increase in sleepiness at 1:30 pm after sleep restriction. In looking at each recovery group, they noted that Group 1 was a lot sleepier at 3 om than Groups 2 and 3. However, Group 3, which had the extended sleep period, was sleepier compared to the nap-takers (Group 2). They also saw that after restriction, the nap-takers had fewer onsets of sleep (none), whereas extended sleepers and normal sleepers (Group 1) had 1 and 2 onsets of sleep, respectively. This indicates that napping is more condusice to restoring alertness after a period of sleep deprivation, which is consistent with other studies that have been done on napping (1).

The authors also monitored what they call the subject’s “sleep architecture”, which is the kind of sleep an individual experiences. There are basically two kinds of sleep: slow-wave sleep (SWS) and Rapid-Eye Movement (REM). SWS represents a period of deep, restful sleep, whereas REM indicates a lighter sleep experience (dreams, which are often rare during deep sleep, occur during REM). Since results indicate that napping seems to provide a better path to recovery than just 8-hours of recovery sleep, or even an extended, 10-hour recovery sleep, Faraut, et al. determined that simple a half-hour of deep, SWS sleep can drastically reduce the homeostatic pressures of sleep. Therefore, deeper sleep, especially in short bouts, prevents our immune system from going into overdrive and our bodies from trying to regulate that abrupt change.

So how does our immune system play into all of this? Well, sleep deprivation triggers various inflammatory responses from our immune system. Studies have shown that pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-8, IL-6, and TNF-a are secreted following chronic partial or total sleep deprivation (2, 3). Additionally, these inflammatory responses can bring about cardiovascular disease (2, 4). Faraut, et al. were not able to see significant increases in IL-8, CRP, or fibrinogen as they had expected. They did manage to see, on the other hand, increases in MPO (myeloperoxidase) levels immediately after sleep deprivation. This is significant because MPO is an peroxidase enzyme that defines the granulocyte function of neutrophils (ie., neutrophils release it to chew things up). MPO also catalyzes the formation of oxidizing agents that eventually bring about atheromatous plaque.

Sleep deprivation and the subsequent increase in peripheral blood leukocytes, therefore, has implications in causing cardiovascular mortality. This is consistent with studies that have shown that there is a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases in shift workers (5). Conversely, midday napping has also been shown to be inversely associated with coronary mortality (6).

Interestingly enough, a study by van Mark, et al. (7) speculates that chrinic sleep dept (almost like insomnia) is common in shift workers, possibly as a protection mechanism against an overstimulation of pro-inflammatory immune mechanisms. This makes sense because we are able to 3 to 4 consecutive all-nighters, and feel relatively fine while doing so. This is due to the suppression of the homeostatic actions of our bodies. However, as soon as we go to sleep, we seen to never be able to wake up. This is likely due to the fact that our immune responses are finally kicking in, and our bodies are naturally trying to make up for the cytotoxic damage caused by the inflammatory responses.

How does all this information help us college students then? It doesn’t, really. This post merely serves as a warning that if we willingly pull all-nighters, we are setting ourselves up for a domino effect of immune responses and the homeostatic pressures exerted by our bodies in response. That, and cardiovascular disease. So, yes, technically, it really isn’t our fault that we’re not able to “heal” enough and in time to hand in our overdue assignments in time for their extended deadlines. But at the end of the day, who told us to pull an all-nighter (let alone 3) to begin with?


___________________________________________________________________________


Primary Reference:

Faraut, B., et al. (2011). Benefits of napping and an extended duration of recovery sleep on alertness and immune cells after acute sleep restriction. Brain. Behavior, and Immunity. 25:16-24.


Secondary References:

1) Takahasi, M., Arito, H. (2000) Maintenance of alertness and performance by a brief nap after lunch under prior sleep deficit. Sleep. 23:813-819.

2) Meier-Ewert, et al. (2004) Effect of sleep loss on C-reactive protein, an inflammatory marker of cardiovascular risk. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 43:678-683.

3) Redwine, L., et al (2010) Effects of Sleep and Sleep Deprivation on Interleukin-6, Growth Hormone, Cortisol, and Melatonin Levels in Humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 85:3597–3603.

4) Irwin M.R., et al. (2010) Sleep loss activates cellular markers of inflammation. Arch. Intern. Med. 166;1756-1762.

5) Puttonen, S., et al. (2010) Shift work and cardiovascular disease—pathways from circadian stress to mortality. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health. 36:96-108.

6) Naska, A., et al. (2007) Siesta in healthy adults and coronary mortality in the general population. Arch. Intern. Med. 167:296-301.

7) van Mark, A., et al. (2010) The impact of shift work induced chronic circadian disruption on IL-6 and TNF-a immune responses. J. Occu. Med. And Toxicology. 5:18-22.